We give people a voice. Independent public-record reporting on India, Pakistan and Bangladesh.
FaujiLeaks
SearchSubmit a tip
Menu

Evidence brief

Three landmark corruption cases in Pakistan: what the record shows

The Sharif Panama Papers references, the Al-Qadir Trust £190 million case and the NLC losses: what courts and inquiries found, and where each stands now.

Published 18 October 2026, Records

This briefing summarises public court records and official reports. Allegations are not findings. Where a court has acquitted a person or set aside a conviction, that outcome is stated. Last reviewed 18 October 2026.

This briefing sets out three of Pakistan's most widely reported corruption cases from the past two decades. One involves the Sharif family of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N). One involves Imran Khan of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). One involves retired army officers at a military-run organisation. Each is told the same way: what was alleged, what the record shows, where it stands now, and why it matters. Status labels follow our editorial standards.

A note on terms. A reference is the charge sheet the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) files in an accountability court. An acquittal means the court found the charges not proved; the person is legally not guilty.

Panama Papers and the Sharif family references (2016–2024)

In 2016 the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) published the Panama Papers, a leak of records from the law firm Mossack Fonseca. They showed that three children of then prime minister Nawaz Sharif were linked to offshore companies connected to flats in Park Lane, London. Petitions in the Supreme Court followed. The case mattered because it tested whether a sitting prime minister could be held to account through the courts. It ended in his removal from office, then convictions, and finally acquittals.

What the record shows

Status today

We found no reported pending appeal against these acquittals as of October 2026.

Why it matters

The case shows the distance between a leak and a legal finding. Offshore records started the process, but the convictions did not survive appeal because, in the appeal courts' view, ownership and wrongdoing were not proved by evidence. It also shows the weight placed on JIT reports, which the IHC said were opinion, not evidence.

Al-Qadir Trust / £190 million case (2019–present)

In December 2019 the UK's National Crime Agency (NCA) accepted a £190 million civil settlement from the family of property developer Malik Riaz Hussain, covering frozen UK funds and a London property. The NCA said the settlement did not represent a finding of guilt and that the money would go to Pakistan. NAB later alleged that the then PTI government let these funds be applied to a liability owed by Bahria Town under a Supreme Court judgment, rather than paid to the state, and that land was given to the Al-Qadir University Project Trust in return. The case mattered because it concerned a former prime minister and the handling of money a foreign agency had returned.

What the record shows

Status today

Why it matters

The case turns on cabinet procedure and the route taken by recovered assets. It shows why the record of cabinet decisions matters. Like the Sharif references, it also shows how long appeals can take: more than 20 months after the verdict, the main appeal had not been decided.

National Logistics Cell stock-market losses (2004–2015)

The National Logistics Cell (NLC) is a military-run transport and logistics organisation. Between 2004 and 2008 it invested about Rs4 billion in the stock market, partly with high-interest bank loans and employees' pension money, contrary to government rules. It lost about Rs1.8 billion. The case mattered because it involved senior retired officers and raised the question of whether they should face civilian or military accountability.

What the record shows

Status today

These were internal military findings, not criminal court judgments. The inquiry reports were not published, and we found no reported further proceedings or prison sentences.

Why it matters

The case is one of the few where retired generals were formally penalised over financial losses. It also shows the limits of public scrutiny: Parliament raised the issue, but the decisions were made inside the army and the full findings remain unpublished. See our guide to reading an audit report for how audit and PAC records can be traced.

The Pandora Papers (2021)

On 3 October 2021 the ICIJ published the Pandora Papers. It said more than 700 Pakistanis were named, including federal ministers, politicians from several parties, retired military officers and their relatives, businesspeople and media owners. Owning an offshore company is not in itself illegal in Pakistan; it becomes an offence if used, for example, to hide assets or evade tax.

On 4 October 2021 the government set up a cell under the Prime Minister's Inspection Commission to examine the names. By January 2022 Dawn reported it had received about 240 names, was working with regulators and the tax authority, and had not established wrongdoing by anyone. We could not find a published final report. Investigation open is therefore the most that can be said, and no individual named in the leak should be treated as having done anything unlawful.

What the three cases have in common

For Pakistan-wide context see our Pakistan page, and for how to follow money in records see money trail. If you hold documents about any of these matters, read source safety dos and don'ts first and do not use a work device or network to contact us through the secure form. Anyone named here may respond through our right of response process.

Frequently asked questions

Was Nawaz Sharif convicted in the Panama Papers case?

He was disqualified by the Supreme Court in July 2017 and convicted in the Avenfield and Al-Azizia references in 2018. The Islamabad High Court acquitted him in both in November and December 2023, and he was acquitted in the Flagship reference at trial.

What is the £190 million case against Imran Khan?

NAB alleged that funds returned by the UK's National Crime Agency were applied to a private company's court liability in exchange for land for the Al-Qadir Trust. An accountability court convicted Imran Khan and Bushra Bibi in January 2025; their appeals are pending in the Islamabad High Court.

Is Imran Khan's Al-Qadir conviction final?

No. As of October 2026 the appeals have not been decided. Requests to suspend the sentences were dismissed by the Islamabad High Court in May 2026 and, for Bushra Bibi, by the Federal Constitutional Court in October 2026.

What happened in the NLC scandal?

The army-run National Logistics Cell lost about Rs1.8 billion on stock-market investments between 2004 and 2008. In 2015 the army dismissed one retired major general, reprimanded one retired lieutenant general and cleared a third.

Does being named in the Pandora Papers mean someone broke the law?

No. Holding an offshore company is not illegal in itself. A government cell examined the Pakistani names, but no published findings of wrongdoing were found.

Sources